Editorial Standards

编辑标准

nvxue.org is an independent knowledge platform focused on women’s education, lifelong learning, and practical growth. These editorial standards explain how we select topics, use sources, handle sensitive subjects, correct errors, and protect reader trust.
nvxue.org 是一个聚焦女子教育、终身学习与实际成长的独立知识平台。本编辑标准说明我们如何选择选题、使用来源、处理敏感议题、纠正错误，并维护读者信任。

These standards apply to articles, learning paths, Nüxué Library entries, resource pages, newsletters, and future events or reading groups published under nvxue.org.
本标准适用于 nvxue.org 发布的文章、学习路径、女学文库条目、资源页面、通讯，以及未来可能开展的活动或共读项目。

1. Our Editorial Purpose

一、我们的编辑目标

Our purpose is to make learning more accessible, historically informed, and practically useful. We publish content that helps readers understand women’s education, build learning capacity, make informed decisions, and take manageable next steps.
我们的目标是让学习更加容易获得、更有历史意识，并具有实际帮助。我们发布的内容应帮助读者理解女子教育，建立学习能力，作出信息更加充分的判断，并采取可以承受的下一步行动。

We do not publish content merely to follow trends, create anxiety, or promise quick transformation. A useful article should clarify a question, provide context, and help the reader think more carefully.
我们不为了追逐热点、制造焦虑或承诺快速改变而发布内容。一篇有价值的文章，应当澄清问题、提供背景，并帮助读者更加审慎地思考。

2. Content Types

二、内容类型

nvxue.org publishes several types of content: historical explainers, practical guides, learning paths, library entries, resource directories, reading lists, and editorial notes. Each type has a different purpose and should be reviewed according to its own standard.
nvxue.org 发布多种内容类型：历史科普、实用指南、学习路径、文库条目、资源目录、书单和编辑说明。不同内容类型具有不同目的，也应按照各自标准进行审核。

Historical explainers should provide context, distinguish evidence from interpretation, and avoid presenting complex history as a simple story of progress or decline.
历史科普应提供背景，区分证据与解释，并避免将复杂历史简化为单一的进步或衰退叙事。

Practical guides should help readers take realistic action. They should avoid exaggerated promises, shame-based language, and one-size-fits-all instructions.
实用指南应帮助读者采取现实可行的行动。它们应避免夸大承诺、羞耻化表达和一刀切建议。

Learning paths should be structured, manageable, and suitable for self-paced learning. They should include goals, audience notes, steps, review points, and related resources.
学习路径应结构清晰、负担可控，并适合自主学习。它们应包含目标、适用人群说明、步骤、复盘节点和相关资源。

Resource pages should be maintained more frequently than ordinary articles. Any phone number, service route, legal information, public resource, or safety-related item must include a review date where appropriate.
资源页面应比普通文章更加频繁地维护。任何电话号码、服务入口、法律信息、公共资源或安全相关内容，都应在适当位置标注复核日期。

3. Source Standards

三、来源标准

We prefer primary and authoritative sources whenever possible. These may include laws, regulations, official statistics, academic institutions, public agencies, international organizations, peer-reviewed research, museum or archive materials, and institutional records.
我们尽可能优先使用一手来源和权威来源。这些来源可以包括法律法规、官方统计、学术机构、公共机构、国际组织、同行评审研究、博物馆或档案资料，以及机构记录。

When a claim depends on a specific source, the article should make that relationship clear. If the source is uncertain, incomplete, disputed, or difficult to verify, the article should use cautious wording.
当某项表述依赖特定来源时，文章应清楚呈现这种关系。如果来源存在不确定、不完整、有争议或难以核验的情况，文章应使用谨慎表达。

We avoid using social media posts, anonymous summaries, promotional pages, or unsourced claims as the main basis for factual statements. They may be useful for identifying questions, but they should not replace reliable verification.
我们避免将社交媒体帖子、匿名整理、商业宣传页面或无来源说法作为事实表述的主要依据。它们可以用于发现问题，但不能替代可靠核验。

4. Handling Historical Claims

四、历史表述处理

Historical content should be careful with words such as “first,” “earliest,” “only,” “founder,” and “origin.” These claims are often sensitive to available records and may change when new materials are reviewed.
历史内容应谨慎使用“第一”“最早”“唯一”“创始”“起源”等表述。这类说法往往受可获得资料影响，并可能随着新材料核验而调整。

When a historical “first” claim is used, we should attribute it to a cited source rather than present it as an absolute conclusion unless the evidence is exceptionally strong.
当使用历史“第一”类表述时，除非证据特别充分，否则应将其归属到所引用来源，而不是将其呈现为绝对结论。

Historical materials may describe older social norms, but nvxue.org does not treat historical gender expectations as instructions for women today.
历史材料可能描述过去的社会规范，但 nvxue.org 不会将历史上的性别期待视为当代女性应当遵循的行为指令。

5. Sensitive Topics

五、敏感议题

Some topics require clearer boundaries. These include minors, family education, relationships, violence, safety, mental health, finance, law, medicine, privacy, and personal data.
部分议题需要更清晰的边界，包括未成年人、家庭教育、关系、暴力、安全、心理健康、财务、法律、医疗、隐私和个人数据。

Content on these topics should provide general educational information only. It should not diagnose a person, assess an individual case, predict personal outcomes, or replace qualified professional support.
这些议题的内容仅提供一般性教育信息，不应诊断任何人，不应评估个案，不应预测个人结果，也不能替代合格专业支持。

When safety may be involved, the article should not imply that better communication alone can solve the problem. If there is violence, coercion, stalking, harassment, threats, or immediate danger, safety and qualified support come first.
当内容可能涉及安全问题时，文章不应暗示仅靠改善沟通就能解决问题。如果存在暴力、胁迫、跟踪、骚扰、威胁或即时危险，应优先考虑安全和合格支持。

6. Financial, Legal, Medical, and Psychological Boundaries

六、财务、法律、医疗和心理边界

nvxue.org does not provide individualized financial, investment, insurance, debt, tax, legal, medical, psychological, or emergency advice.
nvxue.org 不提供个性化财务、投资、保险、债务、税务、法律、医疗、心理或紧急救助建议。

Financial content should explain concepts, questions, risks, and learning paths. It should not recommend specific products, providers, portfolios, transactions, return expectations, or borrowing decisions.
财务内容应解释概念、问题、风险和学习路径，不应推荐具体产品、服务商、投资组合、交易行为、收益预期或借贷决定。

Legal content should describe general frameworks and public information routes. It should not interpret an individual case or tell a reader what legal action to take.
法律内容应描述一般框架和公共信息入口，不应解释个案，也不应指示读者采取某项具体法律行动。

Medical and psychological content should encourage appropriate qualified help when general information is not enough. It should not offer diagnosis, treatment plans, or crisis intervention.
医疗和心理内容应在一般信息不足时鼓励读者寻求合格帮助，不应提供诊断、治疗方案或危机干预。

7. Writing Tone

七、写作语气

Our tone should be professional, careful, and supportive. We should avoid sensationalism, fear-based persuasion, humiliation, gender stereotypes, and unrealistic promises.
我们的语气应专业、谨慎并具有支持性。我们应避免煽动性表达、恐惧式说服、羞辱、性别刻板印象和不现实承诺。

We do not assume that all women, girls, families, or readers have the same needs, resources, risks, or choices. Practical suggestions should leave room for different circumstances.
我们不假设所有女性、女孩、家庭或读者拥有相同需求、资源、风险或选择。实用建议应为不同情况保留空间。

We should prefer clear language over jargon. When technical terms are necessary, they should be explained in plain language.
我们应优先使用清晰语言，而不是堆叠术语。当必须使用专业概念时，应以通俗方式解释。

8. Use of Images, Quotations, and External Materials

八、图片、引用和外部材料使用

Every image, scan, chart, quotation, or archival item should have a recorded source and rights decision before publication.
每张图片、扫描件、图表、引用或档案材料在发布前都应记录来源和权利判断。

We should not use images merely for decoration when the source, permission, or rights status is unclear. If no suitable image is available, publishing without an external image is acceptable.
当来源、授权或权利状态不清楚时，我们不应仅为了装饰而使用图片。如果没有合适图片，不使用外部图片也可以发布。

Quotations should be used sparingly and accurately. The article should not rely on long copied passages when a summary or explanation would serve the reader better.
引用应少量、准确地使用。当概括或解释更能帮助读者时，文章不应依赖大段复制原文。

9. Corrections and Updates

九、纠错与更新

We welcome corrections. Readers may report factual errors, outdated information, broken links, unclear wording, rights concerns, privacy concerns, or safety-resource issues through the corrections page.
我们欢迎纠错。读者可以通过纠错页面反馈事实错误、过时信息、失效链接、表达不清、权利问题、隐私问题或安全资源问题。

When a correction is confirmed, we should update the page as soon as practical and, when appropriate, note the change in the article or internal editorial log.
当纠错被确认后，我们应在可行范围内尽快更新页面，并在适当情况下将变更记录在文章或内部编辑日志中。

Sensitive resource pages should be reviewed on a shorter cycle than ordinary articles. If a public-service number, support route, or legal reference changes, the page should be updated promptly.
敏感资源页面应比普通文章采用更短复核周期。如果公共服务号码、支持入口或法律依据发生变化，应及时更新页面。

Correction route: /about/corrections/
纠错入口：/about/corrections/

10. Privacy and Reader Safety

十、隐私与读者安全

We follow a minimal-data approach. Public reading should not require an account, real name, phone number, identity document, or personal story submission.
我们采用最小数据原则。公开阅读不应要求读者提供账号、真实姓名、手机号码、身份证件或个人经历。

We do not ask readers to submit sensitive records, private messages, photographs, medical files, identity documents, financial records, children’s information, or real-time location information through public forms.
我们不要求读者通过公开表单提交敏感记录、私人聊天、照片、医疗文件、身份证件、财务记录、儿童信息或实时位置信息。

When a subject is safety-sensitive, we should direct readers toward qualified local support rather than invite public disclosure.
当议题涉及安全风险时，我们应引导读者寻求当地合格支持，而不是鼓励公开披露个人细节。

11. Independence and Conflicts of Interest

十一、独立性与利益冲突

nvxue.org is independently operated and does not claim organizational continuity with any historical website that previously used this domain.
nvxue.org 是一个独立运营项目，不声明与此前使用该域名的任何历史网站存在机构延续关系。

If a page includes sponsored content, affiliate links, paid collaboration, donated services, or other material relationships in the future, that relationship should be clearly disclosed near the relevant content.
如果未来页面包含赞助内容、联盟链接、付费合作、捐赠服务或其他重要利益关系，应在相关内容附近清楚披露。

Editorial decisions should not be shaped by undisclosed commercial relationships.
编辑判断不应受到未披露商业关系的影响。

12. Use of AI Tools

十二、人工智能工具使用

AI tools may be used for drafting assistance, structure, language review, summarization of editor-provided materials, or workflow support. They should not replace human editorial responsibility.
人工智能工具可以用于辅助起草、结构整理、语言检查、编辑提供材料的摘要或流程支持，但不能替代人工编辑责任。

Factual claims, citations, sensitive-topic wording, safety information, and legal or financial boundaries must be reviewed by a human editor before publication.
事实表述、引用、敏感议题措辞、安全信息，以及法律或财务边界，必须在发布前由人工编辑审核。

We should not use AI tools to fabricate sources, invent quotations, generate fake expertise, or present uncertain information as verified fact.
我们不应使用人工智能工具伪造来源、编造引用、制造虚假专业性，或将不确定信息呈现为已核验事实。

13. Publication Checklist

十三、发布前检查

Before publication, each substantial page should be checked for purpose, audience, source quality, internal links, privacy risk, sensitive-topic boundaries, author field, dates, correction route, and mobile readability.
发布前，每个重要页面都应检查目标、适用人群、来源质量、内链、隐私风险、敏感议题边界、作者字段、日期、纠错入口和移动端可读性。

A page should not be published simply because the text is complete. It should also be safe, clear, maintainable, and correctly connected to the rest of the site.
页面不应仅因为文字完成就发布。它还应具备安全性、清晰度、可维护性，并正确连接到网站其他部分。

14. Review Cycle

十四、复核周期

General historical and educational articles should be reviewed at least once every twelve months, or sooner when important sources change.
一般历史和教育类文章应至少每十二个月复核一次，或在重要来源发生变化时提前复核。

Practical learning guides should usually be reviewed every six months.
实用学习指南通常应每六个月复核一次。

Financial, legal, safety, wellbeing, relationship, and resource pages should usually be reviewed every three to six months, or sooner when public rules or services change.
财务、法律、安全、身心、关系和资源类页面通常应每三至六个月复核一次，或在公共规则和服务发生变化时提前复核。

15. Contact

十五、联系

For corrections, source questions, privacy concerns, rights concerns, or editorial feedback, please use the corrections page.
如需反馈纠错、来源问题、隐私问题、权利问题或编辑意见，请使用纠错页面。

Contact and corrections: /about/corrections/
联系与纠错：/about/corrections/

Privacy policy: /about/privacy/
隐私政策：/about/privacy/

Safety and support resources: /resources/safety-support/
安全与支持资源：/resources/safety-support/